On March 29, 2013 (GMT 0) at 12: 27 pm
Today, we are open to patent non-claim (OPN) commitments presented by taking another step toward that goal again: first attack unless we have a user, reseller or designated patent on open source software and not to sue developers swear by it.
We ve 10 patents Mapreduce starts by identifying, associated with larger data sets for dealing with Google's open source computing model in the development of the first version is now widely used. Over time, we have different skill sets of Google's patents covered by the pledge would extend.
OPN pledge pledge or similar initiatives to encourage other patent holders to adopt industry, and we will be a model for Google's open source patent pledge. ": we wont sue you if you do not attack first, and [Google-opensource.blogspot.co.uk]
On March 29, 2013 (GMT 0) at 8: 31 pm
Hmmmm. color me deeply suspect. They say "we're putting this stuff into the public domain, but we reserve the right to reveal whenever you feel like it, we are in the domain, remove it." seems to be saying
Your own design as a weapon of attack is pretty funny. In some areas, with some metaphor. "Oh, sorry, I didn't know it was used against me."
Duane Valz, senior patent attorney
Google lawyers written by ...
... And Microsoft roughly the same 24-hour period in their new patented Center ([microsoft.com]) released ...
Why am I not surprised? This is a "don't be evil" as a bad PR move.
Open source is open source. They warned not to sue Google will now have our money and buy the best lawyers, then they can steal, all of the open source idea, patent number with an endless supply of them step by step, or they'll sue you. So it should be illegal! Check me if I'm wrong.
On March 30, 2013 (GMT 0) at 3: 39 pm (gmt 0) on March 30, 2013, 4: 32 am
This is great, I wonder who's behind the Bill? The rich win again ... Here you will be able to come up with original ideas and good people without money, but most money is legal but more good ideas and the man stops the world WINS. ...I want to get off.
BTW, it is likely that the Forbes article as an example, the "companies" patent ... Never receive patents in General, he or she goes to the company that owns it.
If so, might be "open source" is pretty much a thing of the past, at least in the United States?
I don't see why. There is always a line and just change the rest of the world, and brings us into.
If nothing else for the first time after the fact, because patent files and hard patent attacks on open source, you can strengthen it. In other words, some open source software is a new idea if you publish using the old rules, it is somewhat vulnerable to later evidence that they invented the concept first came up with the idea to secretly seek patent according to g. no longer possible (unless you already have a provisional patent was filed before coming out of the software) understood it.
Back on topic ... Welcome this move by Google, it will compete with them and menacing of open-source software is much better than in the past, Microsoft's tactics (funded by direct or proxy fraud).
Hmmmm. color me deeply suspect. They say "we're putting this stuff into the public domain, but we reserve the right to reveal whenever you feel like it, we are in the domain, remove it." seems to be saying
Take it at face value, if you stretch it's a good thing, but the politics of moving wreaks. The only company making billions every quarter now concerned about patent litigation, the rest of us just don't want to pay next month's mortgage. If you've forgotten to Google?
The only company to billions of patent branch lawquits if you think worrying about, you are definitely wrong. There are a lot of not-for-profit organizations and small businesses-lovers have been hit with patent litigation.
On the other hand, large companies tend to be fairly safe: they are lawyers, and they counter sue the patent cross-license agreement,.
As if people in WW, so Google Google when something that is without a doubt a great prejudice, they just refuse to believe it.
View the original article here
No comments:
Post a Comment