How to make your own webhost

We are the best site and achieve success on the order in which the cost is also growing. Dozens of gigabytes per day, multiple servers, all of the legal and business is growing dramatically and our cost per bandwidth (just plain) to account for the tremendous growth in the past year.

We have banner ads, text ads, or go to the site to discuss a partnership with the developer. We're given and if we produce all communities advertising model is based on the Forum and receive favorable treatment from the environment, we strongly feel that this is not the path will then be comfortable to purchase ads in WebmasterWorld.

If you would like to subscribe to Webmasterworld above PayPal click one of the links and fill out the form in a secure https site of them. We are a PayPal verified premier business member in the lower-right corner, click verified seal can be found in our State. Our postal address check or money order (United States funds) If you wish to pay by the screen (bottom link).

You can also use one of the form under the button can subscribe via 2CheckOut.

In addition to supporting Webmasterworlds continued operation and expansion, the obvious benefits of subscribing to the site. Member: an individual may have access to the Forum also. It is one of the best in the business professionals in a relaxed atmosphere. Ad-free environment we add ads. A Special Conference on all Webmasterworld supporters opened a discount only. Note: this service, all subscriptions are final and will not be given a refund.

Thank you
Brett Tabke
WebmasterWorld webmaster

View the original article here

Google's open source patent pledge: attack unless we don't sue you for the first time

Discuss the premium home page Google's open source patent pledge: attack unless we don't sue you for the first time
On March 29, 2013 (GMT 0) at 12: 27 pm
Today, we are open to patent non-claim (OPN) commitments presented by taking another step toward that goal again: first attack unless we have a user, reseller or designated patent on open source software and not to sue developers swear by it.

We ve 10 patents Mapreduce starts by identifying, associated with larger data sets for dealing with Google's open source computing model in the development of the first version is now widely used. Over time, we have different skill sets of Google's patents covered by the pledge would extend.

OPN pledge pledge or similar initiatives to encourage other patent holders to adopt industry, and we will be a model for Google's open source patent pledge. ": we wont sue you if you do not attack first, and [Google-opensource.blogspot.co.uk]

On March 29, 2013 (GMT 0) at 8: 31 pm
Hmmmm. color me deeply suspect. They say "we're putting this stuff into the public domain, but we reserve the right to reveal whenever you feel like it, we are in the domain, remove it." seems to be saying

Your own design as a weapon of attack is pretty funny. In some areas, with some metaphor. "Oh, sorry, I didn't know it was used against me."

On March 29, 2013 (GMT 0) at 11: 47 PM
Duane Valz, senior patent attorney
Google lawyers written by ...

... And Microsoft roughly the same 24-hour period in their new patented Center ([microsoft.com]) released ...

On March 30, 2013 (GMT 0) 3: 24 pm
Why am I not surprised? This is a "don't be evil" as a bad PR move.
Open source is open source. They warned not to sue Google will now have our money and buy the best lawyers, then they can steal, all of the open source idea, patent number with an endless supply of them step by step, or they'll sue you. So it should be illegal! Check me if I'm wrong.
On March 30, 2013 (GMT 0) at 3: 39 pm (gmt 0) on March 30, 2013, 4: 32 am
This is great, I wonder who's behind the Bill? The rich win again ... Here you will be able to come up with original ideas and good people without money, but most money is legal but more good ideas and the man stops the world WINS. ...I want to get off.

BTW, it is likely that the Forbes article as an example, the "companies" patent ... Never receive patents in General, he or she goes to the company that owns it.

On March 30, 2013 (GMT 0) at 12: 34 pm
If so, might be "open source" is pretty much a thing of the past, at least in the United States?
I don't see why. There is always a line and just change the rest of the world, and brings us into.

If nothing else for the first time after the fact, because patent files and hard patent attacks on open source, you can strengthen it. In other words, some open source software is a new idea if you publish using the old rules, it is somewhat vulnerable to later evidence that they invented the concept first came up with the idea to secretly seek patent according to g. no longer possible (unless you already have a provisional patent was filed before coming out of the software) understood it.

Back on topic ... Welcome this move by Google, it will compete with them and menacing of open-source software is much better than in the past, Microsoft's tactics (funded by direct or proxy fraud).

On March 30, 2013 (GMT 0) at 3: 05 pm
Hmmmm. color me deeply suspect. They say "we're putting this stuff into the public domain, but we reserve the right to reveal whenever you feel like it, we are in the domain, remove it." seems to be saying

Take it at face value, if you stretch it's a good thing, but the politics of moving wreaks. The only company making billions every quarter now concerned about patent litigation, the rest of us just don't want to pay next month's mortgage. If you've forgotten to Google?

On March 31, 2013 (GMT + 0) 6: 19 pm
The only company to billions of patent branch lawquits if you think worrying about, you are definitely wrong. There are a lot of not-for-profit organizations and small businesses-lovers have been hit with patent litigation.

On the other hand, large companies tend to be fairly safe: they are lawyers, and they counter sue the patent cross-license agreement,.

As if people in WW, so Google Google when something that is without a doubt a great prejudice, they just refuse to believe it.

 

View the original article here

How Small Sites Suddenly Gain High Positions In Google SERPs

Featured Home Page Discussion This 63 message thread spans 3 pages: 63 ( [1] 2 3 )  > >   How do small sites suddenly gain high ranks
 9:36 am on Mar 21, 2013 (gmt 0)
Hi everyone, I just want to share a finding and perhaps ask if anyone has noticed the same and found any reasons behind it.

We have held position 1 on Google UK for a certain keyword for a good year or so, we have over the past couple of days dropped to P2. Thats not a huge issue but we have been replaced at the top by a site that is keyword stuffed, only has 7 backlinks to their entire domain from 2 other linking domains....A very low quality site indeed. The site in question has never been on the radar before and it has suddenly appeared from nowhere.

Also, on another site I work with, we generally hold top 5 in Google for out main keyword, 2 weeks ago, a domain less than 2 months old, suddenly appeared straight at position 3. Again their site is keyword stuffed and all there inbound links are footer links that seem to be from a link network.

Isn't this the sort of stuff Google is meant to be preventing? It seems the extreme low quality is starting to get back up there.

Any thoughts?

 12:40 pm on Mar 21, 2013 (gmt 0)
Well if they have valuable relevant information then they might deserve a high ranking regardless of whether they have many backlinks or some keyword stuffing. Their usefulness to visitors should be the main factor, not backlinks.
 1:39 pm on Mar 21, 2013 (gmt 0)
They are poorly designed affilaite sites with little unique content. Very low quality.
 2:07 pm on Mar 21, 2013 (gmt 0)
Well if they have valuable relevant information then they might deserve a high ranking regardless of whether they have many backlinks or some keyword stuffing. Their usefulness to visitors should be the main factor, not backlinks.

You are kidding?

 2:12 pm on Mar 21, 2013 (gmt 0)
In my niche I have seen a number of small sites like this. Their information is old (like 2009 old), very low number of back links yet they occupy one of the top 5 spots. This isn't just for one page most of the pages on the site ranks high.
 2:36 pm on Mar 21, 2013 (gmt 0)
It's called "fresh meat" and Google eats it up initially, sometimes...and it might last a day or two, or up to a week or two if lucky. It's a flaw in the algo as far as I'm concerned, but it's their playground.
Blackhatter's are currently having great success and fun with this "Achilles Heal" of G.
 3:09 pm on Mar 21, 2013 (gmt 0)
The short answer is that Google loves spam.

Simply buy a throw away domain, $10
buy 100,000 to 500,000 links from a mass marketer, $150
hire a freelance designer to build the site $150

When the new domain ranks, takes about 4 days, just 301 to what ever you like.

Rank and Bank, Churn and Burn, call it what you like, many in the tough niches are doing it because it works. Don't believe me? Go check out what the payday loans serps look like.

If a $500 investment brings in $1,000 or more a week, and stays there for even just 3 or 4 weeks, you make a great ROI.

Now rinse and repeat, build 10 throw away domains...

The only ones that are hurting right now are those so called white hats trying to do what Google says.

I don't wear a hat, I make money online, as the rules change so must you... or put on a white hat and get an outside job like many other failed webmasters are doing. More worried about the color of some fictitious hat, rather than making money to support their family. I am not evil, I do not wear a hat of any color, I just do what lots of testing has shown me works. I do not call it spam if someone searches for payday loans and see's my site, clicks to get their payday loan and moves on. That is a good user experience and despite what you read here, Google Loves Spam.

Sorry I have been reading these boards for years, so much BS, sometimes I need to rant a bit as so many just dont get it. Throw away the F***ing hat and make some money, once you have money, make whatever color hat site you want. But make money first by following the lead of people who are doing it now.

1- Learn how to build cheap sites that are good for the user, sell what you say you are selling.

2- Learn where to get mass links that work for cheap.

3- Now this one was the hardest for me to learn. Never, Ever, EVER fall in love with your site, just rank and bank, churn and burn, rince and repeat.

...end of rant ... enough reading, back to work everyone.

 3:17 pm on Mar 21, 2013 (gmt 0)
Well that's one way. And probably the only way for that particular niche.
 4:07 pm on Mar 21, 2013 (gmt 0)
Well that's one way. And probably the only way for that particular niche.

If it works in the tough niche, then it is even easier and cheaper to do in YOUR niche... think about it

 5:47 pm on Mar 21, 2013 (gmt 0) 7:29 am on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)
Well, Thats true some sites still rank with keyword stuffing I also faced this problem last month but now that site going downward and my site getting rank well and normal to the top of SERPs. So wait and watch this site will go backward soon mate.
 11:26 am on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)
Sad thing is that most of the older established sites are so riddled with penalties & other negative ranking factors that it's relatively easy to launch a new site, pepper it with links, enjoy some candy then crash & burn.

Then just 301 the links to a new site. Rinse repeat.

Unfortunately most of us are attached to our brand names.

 12:22 pm on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)
Search on Google for "honeymoon period seo" you will see a lot of discussion about this phenomenon.
 1:06 pm on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)
only has 7 backlinks to their entire domain

Just because you only see 7 backlinks doesn't mean those are the only backlinks the domain has.

Much like Google prevents you from seeing queries typed in by those logged into their Google Account... all domain owners can prevent you from scanning the backlinks they provide.

If you disallow a link checker from crawling... guess what?

 1:53 pm on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)

appropriate name, love 'em & leave 'em

moTi

msg:4558598

 2:20 pm on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)
ok, ranting time. i'll play the devil's advocate. eat this:

i can't remember that i've ever read a WebmasterWorld member stating that the fresh website who dares to rank above him is a good website with quality content and deserved the rise to the top. strangely, every time that happens, the content of the new contestants is disqualified as utter rubbish.

sadly, WebmasterWorld nowadays seems to be a pool of grayed established publishers with mostly decades-old content who most of the time do nothing else than complain about the newcomers instead of getting their act together and step up to a new level in order to face the competition. how dare others come up with fresh ideas in order to disrupt the set structures.

ranking a quality new website nowadays is so much harder than ten or five years ago. my website is top-notch in its area, it absolutely deserves to overtake the old stuff in the serps in next to no time. instead, it's a wearing and depressingly tedious fight for months and months with various setbacks for whatever reasons google decides.

i'm sick of the whining. it's pure preservation of the status quo with the established webmasters enviously only wanting to preserve their dated, meanwhile often completely useless stuff in the serps. i'd wholeheartedly welcome any step google and its algorithms take to understand the quality of new websites more rapidly.

 3:12 pm on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)
Whenever these discussions come up: the factor time barely gets enough attention in the discussions. I have seen poor domains outranking the good ones, but never for longer than 6 weeks. At least not at serious terms with more than 5k search volume per month.

Google is pretty harsh, just not pretty fast - IMHO. It can happen to see crap for 6 weeks, but it will vanish or be replaced by new crap. In the past 11 years I have been playing that game, Google always repaired the glitches to the necessary levels to stay on top of their financial wealth. That this is NOT our wealth - well...

 7:17 pm on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)
Yea, there is a pretty funny one in our niche. They are trying to rank for a PHP script and doing very well! A couple of sites tried their script and then removed it. Google must still be counting the removed backlinks. Meanwhile there are no backlinks pointing at it according to Majestic (except internals).
 8:10 pm on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)
I have actually seen this in a SERP recently for a "lead gen" type of term. When doing a competitive analysis I could find no clear reason a new, thin site with few obvious links was ranking in the top 4 for a highly competitive term. I assumed it was an abberation or heavy link buying that the link research tools haven't caught up to yet and which Google hasn't caught up to and burned.

Churn and burn still works, just not for as long on a given domain as it used to.

 12:53 am on Mar 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
I have about 4 competitor sites which I just looked at that have been in the serps for a few months now and are slowly taking over different keywords. They are EMD domains which is not necessarily a bad thing but after looking more closely at them they are all pretty much the same. Same Wordpress type site and theme with just the graphics and content different. You can tell the same person wrote it but just changed things enough. Looking further into the backlinks from Alexa I see these sites have about 70 or so different backlinks.

I checked out over 10 of the backlinks and I see they are blogs with each about 6 articles with keyword loaded entries. They link to about 6 different sites in each article. 2 sites are usually theirs and the other 4 are genuine sites like Wikipedia, Techcrunch, etc. Some of the sites do share ips.

Basically someone created these sites which look okay at first glance and almost all of the backlinks these sites have. I am not sure how an algorithm could spot this but it just shows you the lengths people go to rank their sites.

 11:42 am on Mar 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
I am not sure how an algorithm could spot this but it just shows you the lengths people go to rank their sites.

Are the sites relevant and have any quality? If so would your question better be:

but it just shows you the lengths people HAVE TO go to rank their sites.

G's brought all this crap on themselves, they started it and now they're having to live with it and try and sort it out and the more they try the bigger mess they're getting into.

 1:45 pm on Mar 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
Are the sites relevant and have any quality?

They are about the topic but the post are just spun different ways talking about how good the product is. I would put the quality just above a scraper site. The posts are just there to sell the product.

The backlink sites are just filled with posts on different topics spun so they could include their sites using different keywords for the link.

 3:27 pm on Mar 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
ok, ranting time. i'll play the devil's advocate. eat this:

Candidly, I agree. Maybe the problem with ranking lower is 'ones content does not deserve being higher'... it's all FREE, the results that is... how can anyone complain about something they got for free.

One thing you'll never hear is Wikipedia complaining about lower ranks... they simply expand their content diversity & content appeal.

 3:42 pm on Mar 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
The only ones that are hurting right now are those so called white hats trying to do what Google says.

I don't think there's more accurate words to describe how I'm feeling right now.

Sad thing is that most of the older established sites are so riddled with penalties

I've said it before and but I'll say it again, google should stop punishing spammers and instead concentrate on rewarding sites that have an established record of doing the right thing. If you've never keyword stuffed or bought links you deserve ranking, and a medal. I want my medal.

 5:07 pm on Mar 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
If you've never keyword stuffed or bought links you deserve ranking, and a medal.

While I understand your sentiment and I know your comment was probably tongue-in-cheek, let's remember that it's not if you are a "white-hat" that determines whether you deserve to rank, it's whether you have done everything possible to actually deserve to rank. If you want to rank #1 and you can't objectively say you are the unquestioned best result for a query, then you don't "deserve" to rank #1 no matter what tactics you use.

 5:31 pm on Mar 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
It's not enough to just follow the rules.
 5:39 pm on Mar 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
Google loves spam in the organic results. It boosts their bottom line.

My hat has been getting dirtier and dirtier for a couple of years now. If you do everything white-hat and Google still bans you, accusing you of being black-hat over and over for every site you build ... guess what happens?

 9:23 pm on Mar 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
The only ones that are hurting right now are those so called white hats trying to do what Google says.
I don't think there's more accurate words to describe how I'm feeling right now.

Ya know how ridiculous that sounds!

You're just trying to... "just make a great website?"

Once upon a time Google thought... "a video sharing archive that's what we need!" They invested in video.google.com and it was a dud.

They could have tried again and created video2.google.com and if that turned out to be another dud made video3.google.com but instead they had money so they bought youtube.com

Moral...if you suck at making things great... hire the people that do that and you won't need to worry about webspam.

 9:36 pm on Mar 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
Moral...if you suck at making things great... hire the people that do that and you won't need to worry about webspam.

They had a lott of money fathom so buying youtube.com was an option.

Youtube was an incredible site, and has improved under Google. But you have to have very deep pockets to fund it. Not everyone has that kind of money. So we have a go ourselves. Try and follow the rules because there seems little other direction.

 10:38 pm on Mar 27, 2013 (gmt 0)
They had a lott of money fathom so buying youtube.com was an option.

Yes that is true. But the creators of Youtube didn't have alot of money to create Youtube, which is the point of "just making a great website".

This 63 message thread spans 3 pages: 63 ( [1] 2 3 )  > >  

View the original article here

Study: 50pct of All Email Spam Comes From Only 20 ISPs

Featured Home Page Discussion Study: 50pct of All Email Spam Comes From Only 20 ISPs
 4:33 pm on Mar 18, 2013 (gmt 0)
About 50% of all junk mail on the net emerges from just 20 internet service providers (ISPs), a study has found.

The survey of more than 42,000 ISPs tried to map the net's "bad neighbourhoods" to help pinpoint sources of malicious mail.Study: 50pct of All Email Spam Comes From Only 20 ISPs [bbc.co.uk]

Many of these networks were concentrated in India, Vietnam and Brazil. On the net's most crime-ridden network - Spectranet in Nigeria - 62% of all the addresses controlled by that ISP were seen to be sending out spam.

Networks involved in malicious activity also tended to specialise in one particular sort of malicious message or attack, he discovered. For instance, the majority of phishing attacks came from ISPs based in the US. By contrast, spammers tend to favour Asian ISPs. Indian ISP BSNL topped the list of spam sources in the study.

 9:19 pm on Mar 18, 2013 (gmt 0)

This is nothing new. I've been routinely blocking all these countries (plus Turkey, China, Russia and Taiwan) from every server I have set up for the last decade.

 9:21 pm on Mar 18, 2013 (gmt 0) 9:46 pm on Mar 18, 2013 (gmt 0)
That list probably includes the top 20 most popular free mail services. On one site we have a sign up form for a free service and the subscriber needs to validate their email. So many people have so many different email addresses... if they don't receive their confirmation mail they sign up using another email address and so on. Some don't even remember their correct addresses.

Billions of dollars worth of data wasted in spam traffic and all they have to do is stop providing free mail services. What's wrong with the mailbox that one's ISP provides with their internet service?

 8:48 am on Mar 19, 2013 (gmt 0)
What's wrong with the mailbox that one's ISP provides with their internet service?
Most people will change their ISP at least once every few years.
 9:02 am on Mar 19, 2013 (gmt 0)

What's wrong with the mailbox that one's ISP provides with their internet service?

The free services are usually pretty effective and block bulk mailings from their accounts. On the other hand my original ISP regularly had its IP addresses blacklisted because it did sweet F.A. about botnets using its cusomters' infected machines.
 10:04 am on Mar 19, 2013 (gmt 0)
Most people will change their ISP at least once every few years.

Most people change their free mail service more regularly to get away from spam.

 11:49 am on Mar 19, 2013 (gmt 0)
Almost everyone I know has had the same free email address for years, apart from one or two who switched away from Hotmail at some point.

My ISP had its mail server blacklisted for being an open relay.

 8:43 pm on Mar 19, 2013 (gmt 0)
Almost everyone I know has had the same free email address for years

Sure, so do I. But I keep that one for elite contacts. Anything used for general business and correspondence needs to be disposable and is.

 10:29 pm on Mar 19, 2013 (gmt 0)
The e-mail address you get from your ISP changes every time the ISP gets a new owner-- and no, they don't auto-forward. The old address simply disappears. If the phone company worked that way you'd have to tell everyone a new number every other year. The preceding sentence probably had a lot more meaning ten years ago when people didn't change cell providers every five minutes with accompanying change in entire number, possibly including area code. But still.

This is a major annoyance when sites insist on using your e-mail address as your account name. Let's see now, did I join this service when I was on AOL, or Cox, or something dot edu, or...

 6:20 am on Mar 22, 2013 (gmt 0)
@lucy24 - When I sign up to siteA, I create a disposable email from one of our domains that uses siteA@ - if you find spam going to that address you know where it came from. NO, it's not enough to have one or two disposable email accounts, I want to know exactly who lies and who tells the truth "We will never sell or trade your email address... honest".... we'll see.

Waste of time? Not at all: less than 60 seconds to log in to server, create new email, forward that to a "personal" email address and finish the sign up to siteA. The tricky part is replying to those using an email client that doesn't really have those credentials but it's very rare that a siteA type site is going to need replies; like this very forum, the email account is just for notifications.

Spam it, sell it or spoof it, I'll delete it. Anyone remember a time when some sites wouldn't accept signups from email addresses that weren't major ISPs? I don't feel like I missed anything by not having signed up to them, matter of fact, I'm pretty comfortable with it.

 11:50 pm on Mar 25, 2013 (gmt 0)
anyone remember a time when some sites wouldn't accept signups from email addresses?

Sure do. In fact we used to reject mail sent from web forms using Hotmail addresses. Even today, if someone is using a free mail service, we realise that they are not using their domain mail address and probably have many different disposable email addresses. So many in some cases that it takes weeks for them to find your support response.

If your clientele are companies, allowing them to use disposable email addresses for purchases and support is an absolute waste of time. How in the blazes will they ever get proper support and be advised of critical software updates?

With ISPs the old address can disappear

Not if they are using an email based on their domain. After all, if your clients have web sites and email @ their domain, why settle for anything else. What else can they expect when seeking your expert advice at the expense of your time? So they should at least use a legitimate email address.

 12:44 am on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)
After all, if your clients have web sites and email @ their domain, why settle for anything else.
This only works if the person at the receiving end can get your mail. I remember when I first registered my domain name I was told-- by a fellow human, not by the host-- that I wouldn't be able to use it for e-mail because it wasn't an ISP. Remember when cyberpromo sprouted a dozen new aliases every other day? ISPs simply slammed their doors and would accept mail only from known domains, which mostly meant fellow ISPs.

Except, of course, for services like AOL that fought spam with one hand while handing out unrestricted free trial accounts with the other. Sigh. I can remember people getting banned from forums and coming back half an hour later with a new name and IP after, presumably, pawing through that week's trash and fishing out the latest Free Trial CD.

 8:09 am on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)
@lucy24 - I remember when I first registered my domain name I was told When was that, back in the 90s? I remember hearing the same advice back then but in the last few years it hasn't been an issue for any of ours.
 9:03 am on Mar 26, 2013 (gmt 0)
More recent than that-- but the person I heard it from had had her own domain for a lot longer, so she may have been going by early experience. (I just looked it up. She goes back to 1999. Things were different then.)

I've never tried sending e-mail from my own domain, though. I only use it for incoming-- and not much of that.

If nothing else, it prevents the ghastly blunder of forgetting to set one of your addresses to auto-forward. See, ahem, unrelated thread elsewhere in foo.

 

View the original article here

The fee for a third-party merchants are faced with anger raise Amazon

Discuss the premium home page The fee for a third-party merchants are faced with anger raise Amazon
On March 28, 2013 (gmt 0) 6: 47 PM
Oh, that's pretty impressive.

Amazon "Earth's most customer-centric company planning to raise the prices of consumer products, automotive parts and other products in the United Kingdom and across Europe are using the network to sell to a third party of a wave is described as being imposed by the Internet retailer is facing a revolt from small traders.

If the dealer fees and millions of electronic gadgets like memory cards, headsets and printer cartridges to jump 7 percent to 12 percent in the UK and on April 4, shortly after the Easter weekend in four other major European market is one of the most popular items for busy merchants including Amazon faced anger over Amazon fees will be listed in the. any third party merchants on raising [guardian.co.uk]

On March 28, 2013 at 9: 00 pm (gmt 0) 30 min.
But simply acted like a kid other spoiled because of the strict United States somewhere, someone demanded a "better conclusion".

I am sorry for your friends Gawd, they actually believe and bet that they're in the real world:-)

On March 28, 2013 (gmt 0) 9: 36 pm
I'm still not sure why these people rely on Amazon or eBay websites like wonder?

If you don't do this business free?

On March 28, 2013 (gmt 0) at 10: 13 pm
As they are just flattening the image, you can see the day of your colleagues, and that would cause a rupture.

They'll probably drop a flat 3 percent earlier.

Ah the memories of when it is 15%!

On March 29, 2013 (GMT 0) 4: 01 pm
They probably figure by raising the prices of the seller is going to make more money from them if you leave the best third party Amazon sellers and products for sale and sell them directly to the sales data and make more money. Either way, Amazon.
On March 29, 2013 (GMT 0) 9: 37 am
Amazon is one of the best third-party products for sale and sell them directly to the sales data and make more money.
It really takes a new place in the Homo a bestseller overnight. In this industry, they are small minorities, need to sell data on Amazon under the burden of an ancestor, or if you are moving out. Amazon services, and attract the masses now what do they do, payments or go out and invest in building this business, everyone over time. For those of you who either really sucks.
On March 29, 2013 (GMT 0) at 12: 29 pm
Amazon is likely to raise prices and thus their own can make more profits. Maybe they can't get away with because I know so much more than avoiding taxes! Also why companies to avoid tax shopping?
dpd1

msg:4559642

On March 29, 2013 (GMT + 0) 6: 36 pm
Are you kidding? How to avoid paying taxes in the United States. They're too big what do you think? lol
On March 29, 2013 (GMT 0) at 7: 44 pm
Based on items that sell clothing, stopped using Amazon. Amazon has a certain "rules" ones, as for the image, you will not be able to do when listing.

All (a typo, I meant to say "all"), big brands and the other "big" sellers of the right and left of the Amazon 3rd party was breaking the rules. They did not have a warning.

A small break one rule for men and they will cancel your account.

Customer service is concerned, you're "uprising in India" obviously reading from a script approved Amaazon. So it's efficient, and it's fun too.

Scary third party sale at Amazon. It is not recommended to everyone.

On March 29, 2013 (GMT 0) at 8: 56 pm
Ive been on sale at Amazon has the complete opposite view. (Accidentally) break the rules and they are simply warnings. I contacted their support and are very impressed with how quickly and efficiently they always. I found their product page, another problem with third party lists correctly, they study and make changes within 24 hours.

Do not rely on them, and use them as a marketing Avenue. Initiatives to promote my site and a Facebook page is very well done. Marketing tools, you can go to the source of the Amazon as a way to simply use your order to market yourself will not be included in them.

 

View the original article here

WebmasterWorld weekly roundup 03-28

I failed to live up to the hype to keep hearing about social media. I still believe-crazy, and judging by the contents of my mailbox. Social media solutions to promote individuals and businesses along with a message from the packaging.

It works, but I know some of the wild claims not made out.

I'm now where some company and they offer a few free social media marketing are some of the experiments. Free marketing where they were probably not otherwise know you will do it. For me, an important factor is that they are to participate in the field. These traditional social media success, such as a person or band.

It works, and what doesn't for me to understand the small test.

It is just the beginning and can't wait to see the trends and results.

Other topics is a quick reminder about Pubcon in New Orleans, the rate rise before the end of the next week, if you are planning on attending the book, don't forget.

Last week the WebmasterWorld weekly here.

Welcome to WebmasterWorld weekly roundup this week.

We will review the arrangement last week was Google AdSense site. WebmasterWorld members detailing what is really behind the increased income 50pct in discussion.

The penalty is one of the few high-profile big brands getting in quick recovery, according to Google's Matt Cutts Google Serps advantage that don't have the big brand said. WebmasterWorld members had their view on the subject. What do you think?

Last week we tried to analyze all the Google Analytics Google Universal customers are invited to hear. Have you tried it yet?

When the heated room on busy sites, accessibility in the news, we are advocates for Americans with disabilities site fails to comply with the ADA.

Yahoo acquired news aggregator application, Summly, spent a handsome sum and it will close the app.

AdWords quality score and how to learn more about the impact of negative keywords WebmasterWorld members the benefits of using a large number of negative keywords.

A small site, all of a sudden you get a higher ranking in the Google Serps it how? WebmasterWorld members discuss how high achieving is located in the Google Serps.

Sweden's language Commission following pressure for the company to a more flattering fit the definition of a list of new words on Google "ungoogleable" has dropped the term.

One of the world's larger hosting companies, 1and1, on May 1, 2013, many blogs and offline, the site potentially results in MySQL 4 database is disabled. It's your site, if it is sent to make sure that MySQL 5 is recommended.

Linux users group Microsoft Windows 8 has filed a complaint to the European Union via regulations. In its 14-page complaint, said at the start of the secure boot UEFI Hispalinux to control a computer, known as a "mechanism" means the user is included in other Windows 8 operating system installation, you must obtain a key from Microsoft.

The installation of a security company, according to the most current popular Web browser attacks, and at least one of the multiple use of the Toolkit exploits a vulnerable plugin, you use an outdated version of Java.

This week we covered the story titled, "the largest DDoS attacks slow Internet and publicly known." details have not found much difference before and haven't seen too many reports of problems. However, we spoke to cover it anyway. How do you think, if you were affected?

Google launches shopping Express news this week, the San Francisco Bay area, will be delivered on the same day on the testing limitations.

Google announced that acquiring knowledge and trend analysis for the user to react faster in real time to see that.

Google, Google News, marketing services, had this to say, "he should violate our article quality guidelines promotion strategy for this kind of employment considerations." it's a very forthright and sites from the user failing to comply could lose their positions in Google News.

Amazon "Earth's most customer-centric company planning to raise the prices of consumer products, automotive parts and other products in the United Kingdom and across Europe are using the network to sell to a third party of a wave is described as being imposed by the Internet retailer is facing a revolt from small traders.

Google search for shopping is to stop using the API. Find out more in our room.

This week, we ask, "will the desktop Windows Blue end?" our rooms have your say on the subject.

Facebook is still a Menlo Park to build a second campus in the news has expanded to work with.

The first metric multi comScore's new Media Metrix comes in both desktop and mobile platforms, statistics and measurements. A close look at the details for mobile use and expose some interesting facts about. No surprise at the top of Google and Yahoo and Microsoft third. Interesting stats and more below, Amazon, aol, Facebook site.
ComScore is a convenient table that is contained in a press release. Learn more about our room theme.

You will discuss that we haven't covered themselves or I delete messages or posting some news and let me know.
Enjoy your week!

Cheers
Neil
@engine

WebmasterWorld follow on Twitter. #Webmasterworld or @webmasterworld

WebmasterWorld on Facebook.

View the original article here

WebmasterWorld Weekly Roundup March 21

Over recent weeks i've been wrestling with my strong views on privacy vs openess. What's really giving me angst is the continuing trend towards software, hardware and services that want to join the dots over privacy.

I doubt the CEO of Company X is sitting in their cave waiting for my next posting to appear, reading it and drawing a conclusion on me as an individual.

It's far more automated, and my data is a commodity.

Many people seem comfortable opening their lives up on Facebook, or allowing tracking of everything they do. Most are not thinking of their privacy, but just taking the free services and using them without a second thought.

Can you think of any of the services i'll miss if I stop sharing, and, importantly, will I really miss it?

Ok, i'll end my rant and get back in my own cave.

Last week's WebmasterWorld Weekly is here.

Welcome to this week's WebmasterWorld Weekly Roundup.

Last week we heard that Google is testing a couple of new search features: For one, you may have noticed that the font of the URLs in search results is now noticeably bigger. Google is also testing a new "search within" feature which allows users to focus their search on results just from one site.

There is a report that Facebook is testing whether to allow users to click on a hashtag to pull up all posts about similar topics or events so it can quickly index conversations around trending topics and build those conversations up, giving users more reason to stay logged in and see more ads. Would the hashtags be helpful to users, or just helpful to Facebook?

This week there was a great thread where WebmasterWorld Members were discussing how best to optimize a MySQL database for WordPress.

Microsoft Advertising published a study: "Consumer Experience Is Everything." Microsoft's Natasha Hritzuk said, "In our new study, called Cross-Screen Engagement, we found that while the era of ?Content is King? isn?t over per se, there is a new ?Crown Prince? coming on the scene: consumer experience." What do you think of the study?

Are the giant arrows on AdSense ads creating bad clicks? Join our discussion on the topic.

A study of 42,201 ISPs indicated that about 50% of all junk mail, phishing attacks and other malicious messages came from just 20 networks. Read more about the survey, and let us know what you think in our thread.

Pinterest announced it's rolling out a new look, and said, "We added a few new things to the close-up view of pins to help you discover things you love that you might not have known about otherwise."

We asked the question this week, is Facebook pushing developers into paying for participation. It's been suggested it is an attempt to stifle applications that compete with Facebook-owned services or part of an effort to get developers to pay for ads on Facebook. What do you think?

Can you think of any new ways of measuring SEO performance? Join our discussion on the topic.

Microsoft has said Windows 7 SP1 will start to roll out on Windows Update and Windows 7 RTM (with no service pack) will no longer be supported as of April 9th, 2013.

Last week we reported that Google Reader was closing down. This week, it seems that Google has resurrected the RSS handling extension for Chrome browser.

Bing announced an interesting new tool: Site Move Tool. Bing said, "The new Site Move tool under the Diagnostics and Tools section in Bing Webmaster Tools can be used to tell Bing that you have moved and permanently redirected your site, or a section of your site, to a new location."

WebmasterWorld Members this week discussed the publisher's notification by Google that certain medical keywords, part of the human anatomy, are 'too sensitive' for Google's advertisers.

There was a report made this week over the Chameleon botnet, which is made up of 120,000 home PCs. Apparently, the botnet clicks on ads and is costing advertisers as much as $6m per month.

Bad merchants watch out: Google is out to get bad merchants, and it will soon launch an algorithm to demote merchants providing poor buyer experience.

WebmasterWorld Members this week are discussing their experiences after making the switch to responsive design web sites.

Facebook is rolling out a new design. It said, "We heard from you that the current timeline layout is sometimes hard to read. Starting today, all posts are on the right side of your timeline, with photos, music and other recent activity on the left."

I read of a report that Yahoo is in talks over a share in the Dailymotion video site.

Look out Twitter clones: Twitter this week was awarded a patent on twitter: "Device independent message distribution platform." At the same time, the messenging service celebrated its seventh birthday.

YouTube was on a talk-itself up mission when it announced it has 1 billion unique users each month.

Google was keen to tell us about Google Keep, a cloud-based note taking App. Find out more in our thread.

Following on from last week's announcement that Google Chrome's Sundar Pichai has taken over Android from Andy Rubin, this week, Eric Schmidt clarified that Chrome and Android will remain separate products.

Have you found some news that we haven't covered or discussed, drop me a message, or post it yourself and let me know.
Have a productive week!

Cheers
Neil
@engine

Follow WebmasterWorld on twitter. #webmasterworld or @webmasterworld

WebmasterWorld on Facebook.

View the original article here